From: | Neil Foster <neil.foster@newcastle.edu.au> |
To: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 04/06/2019 02:12:34 UTC |
Subject: | ODG: "Fettering doctrine" re Government contracts in the NSWCA |
Dear Colleagues;
While contract law is not my main area of interest, I was struck by this recent decision of the NSW Court of Appeal dealing with the validity of contracts entered into by governments: see
Searle v Commonwealth of Australia [2019] NSWCA 127 (31 May 2019)
https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/5cee35b8e4b02a5a800c11de . A strong bench of the Court (Bathurst CJ, Bell P, and Basten JA) gives a detailed analysis of the extent to which a government body may “fetter itself” by entering a contract. The facts
involved a low-level contract- an agreement signed with a trainee sailor to provide training towards a recognised trade qualification, which in the end was not provided. But the implications are of course much wider. The Court held (Bell P writing the main
judgment) that governments can enter contracts which are valid in relation to future obligations, and that (while it may not usually be appropriate to order specific performance of a contract if the government later changes its mind) damages may be awarded
for breach. No doubt other colleagues more across the intersection between administrative law and contract law issue will find lots of other points of interest.
Regards
Neil
NEIL FOSTER
Associate Professor, Newcastle Law School
Faculty of Business and Law
409 Hunter St
Newcastle
T: +61 2 49217430
E: neil.foster@newcastle.edu.au
Further details: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/profile/neil-foster
My publications: http://works.bepress.com/neil_foster/ , http://ssrn.com/author=504828
Blog: https://lawandreligionaustralia.blog
The University of Newcastle (UoN)
University Drive
Callaghan NSW 2308
Australia
CRICOS Provider 00109J
|